For a change.Shanti418 wrote: But it opens a lot of questions

Is there a site anywhere cataloging all the questions they haven't answered?
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
OK, now, granted, this is coming from the POV of someone who has only seen the first 2 series (and only the one time back when they were broadcast), but, would it be totally wrong to suppose the following:Obfleur wrote:Claire's dead. Jack was probably involved in her death somehow (not like he killed her - but like he couldn't save her), so he can't face the baby.Shanti418 wrote: SPOILER
Where's Claire? Why does Jack have that reaction to the baby?
Well we don't see him, and Jack is drunk and on crazy pills in the finale, so maybe it's just that he can't let go. The other guy's reaction could go either way, as with all things Lost...though check out mobisode 13 if you really want to know what's up there, the producers have confirmed that it's canonProfessor Smooth wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Jack's father revealed to be alive, and working at the hospital, in the Season 3 finale? WTF is up with that?
True 'nuff dat.Professor Smooth wrote:Oh, the thing with John and the grenade? Awesome.
Professor Smooth wrote:SPOILER!
Jin...
SPOILER!
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
The oceanic 6 has already been confirmed as those 6 officially.Shanti418 wrote:I think the 6 is Jack, Kate, Aaron, Hurley, Sayid, and Sun.
1. I was just responding to MV saying there was one more.wideload wrote:The oceanic 6 has already been confirmed as those 6 officially.Shanti418 wrote:I think the 6 is Jack, Kate, Aaron, Hurley, Sayid, and Sun.
http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Oceanic_6
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
Well wiki sits are not official. But they often link to official sources... why don't we have a winky emoticon?Shanti418 wrote:1. I was just responding to MV saying there was one more.wideload wrote:The oceanic 6 has already been confirmed as those 6 officially.Shanti418 wrote:I think the 6 is Jack, Kate, Aaron, Hurley, Sayid, and Sun.
http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Oceanic_6
2. They've already all appeared, so unofficial OR official, they are the 6.
3. Wikisites are now "official"? Hells yes. Truthiness reigns supreme!