Dunno. Has anybody ever needed him before?sprunkner wrote:Where's Ultimate Weapon when you need him?
[Spidey's first post wins this thread]
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
snarl wrote:Just... really... what the **** have [IDW] been taking for the last 2 years?
Brendocon wrote:Yaya's money.
Stu, go to the Freedom of Speech thread, where I am responding to you.Denyer wrote:Mmm, the essence being that freedom of speech can't be abrogated, but people should exercise self-restraint.Yaya wrote:I'm an American, and I can say that there should be limits to liberty, in one's actions and in one's words. Even the founding fathers of America, like Jefferson, understood this.
Insult is intent rather than choice of words... and, by that criteria, pretty much everything I've ever said about religion is an insult, regardless of how polite I may come across as being.insulting someone's belief's should be considered a transgression of our right to free speech, in other words, transgressing the reasonable limits of free speech.
Religion is a choice. Personal politics are a choice. Therein lies the distinction.to you, race, gender,and sexuality are "irrational grounds". To me, I would include religion as well
For some odd reason I feel all warm and fuzzy, if they all decide to stay there and chant his name in a zealot of FRENZY.Professor Smooth wrote:Since this thread's rapidly turning into a freedom of speech debate, check this out.
http://www.transfans.net/phpBB2/viewtop ... 8095#68095
On the Iran thing. I feel terrible for the people in that country who are going to be slaughtered because the views of the madman in power.
no..., it's none of my concern if they are bombed because their president want to start a form of war and his people desides to stay where the bombing may occur, why should i care?Metal Vendetta wrote:Sterotyping much? We all know it's a zealot of RUMBLE!Gekigengar wrote:For some odd reason I feel all warm and fuzzy, if they all decide to stay there and chant his name in a zealot of FRENZY.
Gekigengar wrote: no..., it's none of my concern if they are bombed because their president want to start a form of war and his people desides to stay where the bombing may occur, why should i care?
.
If you want to assassinate him, there are better ways than dropping a bomb on the building you think he is in. Certainly bombing would lack the necessary element of plausible deniability. And I think even Dubya would think twice before blowing up a nuclear power station. The resulting release of radiation would be worse than Chernobyl.Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:Im lost...
I think they should just fly a stealth over and take out president nut case and his Nuclear plant and deny all knowledge... **** it, I would.
Look at Pakistan. They had a democratically elected president, Nawaz Sharif, who was overthrown in a military coup by a dictator, Pervez Musharraf.Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:I like the idea that this new leader was put in place by the US, hes so off the wall he will provide the perfect reason to invade... simple