Homosexuality cure?

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:25 pm

Uberking Robert wrote:Go phuck yourselves, cocksuckers.

nice atitude - maybe you have repressed feelings, hence your hatred towards homosexuals. perhaps you need to 'come out' ?

Post by **snarl** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:29 pm

I'm really, really sorry.

Lets forget our ills and start again, the things I said about you probably aren't true.

Professor Smooth · Post by **Professor Smooth** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:53 pm

Can we remove the homophobe from my thread, please? I'm planning on making out with Brend any second now and having him around would make that really akward.

inflatable dalek · Post by **inflatable dalek** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:21 pm

Professor Smooth wrote:Can we remove the homophobe from my thread, please? I'm planning on making out with Brend any second now and having him around would make that really akward.

But you said you only loved me!

Post by **Denyer** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:34 pm

snarl wrote:I'm really, really sorry.

Was this bit a Father Ted quote?

Ah... no. "So" rather than "really", isn't it?

Looks like you've got the admin business in hand, anyway...

Uberking Robert · Post by **Uberking Robert** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:09 pm

The people who say "if you hate gays you're gay yourself" are obviously gay.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:12 pm

Uberking Robert wrote:The people who say "if you hate gays you're gay yourself" are obviously gay.

That would be you then?

Look mate lets clear this up.

Do you think Homosexuality is wrong - yes or no.

If yes, then please leave.
If no, then stop being a gay.

inflatable dalek · Post by **inflatable dalek** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:14 pm

Uberking Robert wrote:The people who say "if you hate gays you're gay yourself" are obviously gay.

But what about people who say they hate people who hate people who hate gays?

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:15 pm

inflatable dalek wrote:
Uberking Robert wrote:The people who say "if you hate gays you're gay yourself" are obviously gay.
But what about people who say they hate people who hate people who hate gays?

maybe they are like reverse gayers ?

Post by **Denyer** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:16 pm

Alas, eleventy-one years is far too short a time to live among such excellent and admirable hobbits! I don't know half of you half as well as I should like. And I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

The Last Autobot · Post by **The Last Autobot** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:19 pm

Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:
Uberking Robert wrote:The people who say "if you hate gays you're gay yourself" are obviously gay.
That would be you then?

Look mate lets clear this up.

Do you think Homosexuality is wrong - yes or no.

If yes, then please leave.
If no, then stop being a gay.

Well If he thinks the answer is yes is not a motive to leave but to adress the subject properly and not insulting anybody.

Because none has to think the same.

So you think everyone in society should conform to your views ... interesting

Bouncelot · Post by **Bouncelot** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:19 pm

Denyer wrote:Alas, eleventy-one years is far too short a time to live among such excellent and admirable hobbits! I don't know half of you half as well as I should like. And I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

*scratches head whilst trying to work out if this works out as a compliment before being surprised as Denyer disappears in a puff of smoke.*

Uberking Robert · Post by **Uberking Robert** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:21 am

Hmm, I'll just clear this up. I hate everybody in this forum but me and I wish everybody in this forum but me would die by explosive diarrhea.

Predabot · Post by **Predabot** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:31 am

I do notice that as ussual Brendocon and Snarl seems to "get in the fight"..

Snarl, that you use that AIDS thing as some sort of insult is making me a bit uneasy.

I fail to see why some find that funny...

Uberking Robert · Post by **Uberking Robert** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:09 am

We have to find a cure for gayness before we all start getting facials, crying, talking about our feelings and watching Barbara Streisand.

Bouncelot · Post by **Bouncelot** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 11:13 am

Uberking Robert wrote:We have to find a cure for gayness before we all start crying, and talking about our feelings

Ah, so straight men are mindless lager louts rather than real people who have feelings then?

Post by **Denyer** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 1:40 pm

Many of us are complete twаts, yes. Though this probably has more to do with being human in general than having one stunted chromosome.

Legion · Post by **Legion** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 3:04 pm

Uberking Robert wrote:Hmm, I'll just clear this up. I hate everybody in this forum but me and I wish everybody in this forum but me would die by explosive diarrhea.

riiight, i hate to feed the trolls, but if that is the case, what the [composite word including 'f*ck'] are you doing here you daft ****??

Denyer wrote:Many of us are complete twаts, yes. Though this probably has more to do with being human in general than having one stunted chromosome.

I'm afraid you're probably right there.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:03 pm

Uberking Robert wrote:Hmm, I'll just clear this up. I hate everybody in this forum but me and I wish everybody in this forum but me would die by explosive diarrhea.

Surely these sentences are in the wrong order?

Denyer wrote:
Uberking Robert wrote: Men could stand to be far more masculine nowadays.
What's masculine when it's at home?

Most heavily defining male traits (eg, long hair, tunics) from a few hundred years back would be viewed as feminine today.

The fictional character Conan the Barbarian, who Robert has quoted in his signature, being case in point.

Uberking Robert wrote:IMO we've really let ourselves turn into a bunch of pussies compared to how we were 40+ years ago.

Ah, yes. The 1960s. When Hippie culture was all the rage...

Post by **Denyer** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:10 pm

Rebis wrote:The fictional character Conan the Barbarian, who Robert has quoted in his signature, being case in point.

Fun fact: Arnie had to lay off the steroi—er, bodybuilding for that film, because his muscles became so inflexible he couldn't move his arms far enough to swing a sword.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:30 am

ban his sorry ass please

Uberking Robert · Post by **Uberking Robert** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:43 am

Why is it that virtually nobody is aware that Conan the Barbarian was a series of books written in the 30's way before it was a crappy movie (it had good music and props but otherwise sucked, and Ahnuld's barbarian was a total pussy compared to the man in the books)?

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:53 am

because no one gives a [composite word including 'f*ck'] about stuff like that unless your a sad lil wank stain

Post by **Denyer** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 1:48 am

Illegitimi non carborundum. Kid gloves are off in this thread, as the insults have gone back and forth... outside of it, or in crossing certain lines, we'll start talking reactions, 'k?