(If you set 'em up, I'll knock 'em down.
![Smile :)](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
yes I do like it, it's something new yet also something back to basics (original Microman toys)Autobloke wrote: So, do we like the idea of female drivers? (leaves question slightly ambiguous)
That reminds me of the time I was riding a friend's bike, and he conveniently forgot to tell me the brakes didn't work. I found out when I went full speed into a wall and nearly lost my balls on the bike's metal bar.Autobloke wrote:My sister wanted to learn to drive, so we put her in the driver's seat of her boyfriend's mini. As it's a such a crap motor, we could push it down the road without taking the handbrake off.
My sister didn't know what was happening (the engine was still switched off) and screamed her head off.
How we laughed.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
http://tfarchive.com/community/showthre ... adid=31415Shanti418 wrote:Got a link I could check out?
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
The blue's too dark. And where's his trademark white and red stripes? What's the point of remaking a character and then dropping his distinctive apps?Denyer wrote:Colour photos of Skids:
http://tformers.com/ig.php?mode=view&al ... 00&start=0
http://tformers.com/ig.php?mode=view&al ... 00&start=0
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
I don't want it EXACTLY the same, I'm just saying that it was one of those things that made a blue van into a character. How many TF fans would have moaned if MP Prime had been an orangey-red and not the colour he's always been? 'But Optimus is RED' they'd winge. And lots of people would nod their heads and agree.Cyclone_X wrote:if YOU personnaly WANT it to look like the original toy (if you want to stay conservative and die hard G1 fan) then do what you want, but dont blame HasTak for such minor 'losses' in details
*searches around frantically looking for joke before Autobloke gets back*Autobloke wrote: Frankly I don't care what car he is, as long as he's still small and yellow.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.