Sins of the Wreckers
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
https://twitter.com/NickRoche/status/619990272701820928
More Wreckers! Yay! More Impactor! Yay! More Arcee! Er...
More Wreckers! Yay! More Impactor! Yay! More Arcee! Er...
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Holy ******* ****!
I'm sure if Nick can write the hell out of rare European release toys, he can write Arcee.
I'm sure if Nick can write the hell out of rare European release toys, he can write Arcee.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
TBH I think it'll be good to get her away from Barber, who still doesn't seem to have a handle on her character...
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Ditto Prowl.
It would be good if he could somehow include Prime.
And Galvatron.
And Soundwave.
Lets face it, Barber's not my fave.
It would be good if he could somehow include Prime.
And Galvatron.
And Soundwave.
Lets face it, Barber's not my fave.
- Best First
- King of the, er, Kingdom.
- Posts:9750
- Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location:Manchester, UK
- Contact:
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
But not Spike
Very excited by this.
And the prospect of 5-6 months where we get this and MTMTE. Bliss.
Very excited by this.
And the prospect of 5-6 months where we get this and MTMTE. Bliss.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
My biggest problem with this isn't actually who's included in it, but who's missing from that cover...
WHERE'S GUZZLE?!?!!!!
WHERE'S GUZZLE?!?!!!!
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
-
- Transfans.net Administrator
- Posts:792
- Joined:Mon Mar 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
This has amazing written all over it.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Going to try and get an interview and thus the initial scoop. Wish me luck, lads.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Sweeeeeeet.
And I think I might actually prefer Costa and McCarthy to Barber.
And I think I might actually prefer Costa and McCarthy to Barber.
"But the Costa story featuring Starscream? Fantastic! This guy is "The One", I just know it, just from these few pages. "--Yaya, who is never wrong.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Barber is a mediocre writer forced to roll with shilling for the toys. Even a good writer (Budiansky) had a lot of trouble with that.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
I know an English dude who lacks a bit of hair but makes up for it with wedding videos that has a track record of actually excelling in those circumstances...
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
My problem with Barber isn't so much the product-shilling - I thought that Combiner Wars was reasonably coherent despite all the shoehorning - it's more that his plots always seem to take ages getting anywhere and I'm never quite sure when they've arrived. MtMtE may be rambling but what Roberts gets right is that he hits his story beats almost perfectly, be they in a three-part epic or a "bottle show" standalone issue, which means that they're satisfying despite the longer-arcing plot threads going unresolved. But with the comic formerly known as RiD, we get... Prowl's up to something, Prowl's killing Decepticons, Prowl's crossed the moral event horizon, Prowl's massacring Decepticons, Prowl's up to something else, Prowl's gone gung-ho and still killing Decepticons, psyche - half of the Decepticons he killed aren't really dead, Prowl's joined the Decepticons, psyche - Prowl was under Bombshell's control the whole time, Prowl's an unwilling Constructicon, Prowl is freed from Bombshell's control, Prowl becomes a willing Constructicon, Prowl's up to something, Prowl's crossed the moral event horizon, Prowl's under the influence of the Constructicons, Prime and Prowl have a fight, Prowl teams up with Rattrap.
In storytelling terms, the only thing I can compare it to is a soap opera - Prowl's like the Phil Mitchell of the comic formerly known as RiD. I hope he falls off the wagon and starts doing crack again next.
In storytelling terms, the only thing I can compare it to is a soap opera - Prowl's like the Phil Mitchell of the comic formerly known as RiD. I hope he falls off the wagon and starts doing crack again next.
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
So annoyingly accurate. To me, the sign of a weak writer is that they come up with a strong idea and never move on, shoving it in our faces over and over again as if to say "See?! Isn't it great?!" There's no subtlety. Prowl has been in our faces from day freakin one. On paper, I thought the idea of Prowlestator was a clever one. But Barber has taken a character that Roche built up to be one of the most intriguing in the entire IDW universe and butchered him. Same thing with Arcee. She's a very confusing character now that I can't get a handle on.Metal Vendetta wrote: But with the comic formerly known as RiD, we get... Prowl's up to something, Prowl's killing Decepticons, Prowl's crossed the moral event horizon, Prowl's massacring Decepticons, Prowl's up to something else, Prowl's gone gung-ho and still killing Decepticons, psyche - half of the Decepticons he killed aren't really dead, Prowl's joined the Decepticons, psyche - Prowl was under Bombshell's control the whole time, Prowl's an unwilling Constructicon, Prowl is freed from Bombshell's control, Prowl becomes a willing Constructicon, Prowl's up to something, Prowl's crossed the moral event horizon, Prowl's under the influence of the Constructicons, Prime and Prowl have a fight, Prowl teams up with Rattrap.
Bumblemeemissumus Prime does make a good point, to Barbers credit, but a competent writer should be able to do more with what he's been given.
Having said that, RID is probably targeted at a younger audience, so the problem may lie with my not being able to accept that. Were it not in the same universe and tied to MTMTE, I would have forgone it long ago.
"But the Costa story featuring Starscream? Fantastic! This guy is "The One", I just know it, just from these few pages. "--Yaya, who is never wrong.
- Optimus Prime Rib
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2215
- Joined:Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location:College Station, TX
- Contact:
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
snarl wrote:I know an English dude who lacks a bit of hair but makes up for it with wedding videos that has a track record of actually excelling in those circumstances...
Shanti418 wrote:
Whoa. You know they're going to make Panthro play bass.
- Impactor returns 2.0
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:6885
- Joined:Sat Sep 22, 2001 11:00 pm
- ::Starlord
- Location:Your Mums
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Please be good!
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Yaya wrote: Having said that, RID is probably targeted at a younger audience, so the problem may lie with my not being able to accept that...
I dunno, I don't get that from reading it--and some series, like the Dreamwave Energon series, that are explicitly aimed at kids, were much more enjoyable. Barber's just a writer with a few decent ideas and poor, poor execution.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
November solicits are out: http://news.tfw2005.com/2015/08/19/idw- ... ons-299919snarl wrote:Ditto Prowl.
\o/THE WRECKERS RETURN! Somebody’s kidnapped PROWL… but does anybody want him back? A lifetime of messing with everybody’s lives comes around to haunt him. Fortunately, he’s always got a plan. In this case… the one team of brutal, broken heroes… the WRECKERS!
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Some schlub has interviewed Nick for Bleeding Cool. Probably some arse with a high opinion of his questions. http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/10/26/ ... ick-roche/
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
I'd forgotten how damn sexy Roche is. The Darkness stuff sounds brilliant too... I vaguely know one of them, I'll have to get back in touch.
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
He is a beautiful slab of Irish dreamboat, int he? Look at that. Look at that hair.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
-
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:3132
- Joined:Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:00 pm
- ::Hobby Drifter
- Location:Tokyo, Japan
- Contact:
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Thanks for using that pic.bumblemusprime wrote:He is a beautiful slab of Irish dreamboat, int he? Look at that. Look at that hair.
snarl wrote:Just... really... what the **** have [IDW] been taking for the last 2 years?
Brendocon wrote:Yaya's money.
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Nice ish. Set things up quite well, I thought. Very much looking forward to this.
"But the Costa story featuring Starscream? Fantastic! This guy is "The One", I just know it, just from these few pages. "--Yaya, who is never wrong.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Teeny thumbnails of a preview for issue 2. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... eview.html
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Latest issue is finally out.
Meh. I am really struggling to enjoy this. Maybe it will read better as a trade.
Meh. I am really struggling to enjoy this. Maybe it will read better as a trade.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
First half of the issue I was like
Then I was like
Then I was like
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
Okay, so I've gathered one thing from this series so far.
That James Roberts, and not Nick Roche, was the writer on Last Stand of the Wreckers.
Don't like the story. Don't like the art, more specifically the muddled coloring. Dialogue wordy in a bad way.
I mean, it's not horrible but it's just not that good. Disappointed, as I was expecting something along the lines of LSOTW.
That James Roberts, and not Nick Roche, was the writer on Last Stand of the Wreckers.
Don't like the story. Don't like the art, more specifically the muddled coloring. Dialogue wordy in a bad way.
I mean, it's not horrible but it's just not that good. Disappointed, as I was expecting something along the lines of LSOTW.
"But the Costa story featuring Starscream? Fantastic! This guy is "The One", I just know it, just from these few pages. "--Yaya, who is never wrong.
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
I think the difference is that on LSOTW, Nick and James were editing each other's dialogue with the result that it was much snappier and cleaner; this feels like it really needs an edit to maybe pare away some of the extraneous stuff. As it is, I find that it seems overly wordy for such an action-focused story.
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
What's most surprising is the art doesn't seem up to Roche's amazing standards either. Maybe it's the coloring. Maybe it's intentionally like that due to the Noisemaze stuff, but I find it very muddled compared to Roche's clean work of the past.
"But the Costa story featuring Starscream? Fantastic! This guy is "The One", I just know it, just from these few pages. "--Yaya, who is never wrong.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
Re: Sins of the Wreckers
I think that James made Nick's dialogue crisper and generally gave the story more gravitas; Nick kept the action flowing and killed characters that James might not have been as eager to knock off.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.