He's partial to going a bit mental especially where humans are concerned.
Only after you edited it.Aardvark wrote:
Anyway I was only saying you could, I didn't say I would...
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
Only after you edited it.Aardvark wrote:
Anyway I was only saying you could, I didn't say I would...
I pretty much agree with everything you say above.KingMob wrote:Yeah? Not too keen myself; a little too much like predestination to me.Yaya wrote:Actually never really followed the cartoon, but I did kind of like that idea of the Autobots being workers and the Decepticons being warriors. I like it much more than the whole Primus/Unicron thing.
Seems like it takes away a lot of drama and emotional content from the idea of a civil war, both on a larger scale but perhaps more importantly, on a smaller, more personal scale...referring to the personal motivations of individual characters here.
If someone was always and is always going to be a Good Guy or a Bad Guy and has absolutely no chance to change, who cares what their reasoning for their behaviour is, or even what tehy think about events? They're simply going to be responding to stimuli based on a narrower set of choices, of which morality and ethics have been drained of meaning. Carrying out rote roles that have no higher purpose other than executing predetermined objectives.
Execute {Evi}l Plan 42 to Gain Energy to Build Planetary Dreadnought. Counter with {Noble} Action 69 to stop the Other Ones.
Except 'evil' and 'noble' barely mean anything and you fight each other because You Are Of the Other and Not One of Us and nothing else.
Oh, we're back to robots and programming. Intended to be that or not, is it fair to evaluate them according to what that means to a human?
The Transformers may look like robots to humans, but they are aliens first, no? I think of them as aliens before robots. Metallic mechanical aliens, to be sure, but that doesn't make them analogous to our conception of robitcs...and now I end up repeating a point made by BF and Karl and Rebis...
...
Also, the idea of a god being involved and also not particualrly giving a toss about the individual lives of his 'children' makes warfare, esp civil warfare, more gim and gritty for me. The god doesn't actually have to show up for that to work, but it was pretty powerful when Primus turned up and sent everyone to die, no? But also doesn't work that often.
So a compromise state is desirable, yes - and that atmosphere is one that seems present in Stormbringer, with the characteristic moment of Jetfire looking for a scientific explanation for the apparitional qulaity of his menacers, and other moments.
Hopefully it will continue. And we won't find out that Thunderwing was originally designed to turn into an axe and Jetfire a saucepan.
See, here is where you make a valid point about your gripes concerning Furman's writing style....Yaya wrote:Some might have misconstrued that I don't like my Transformers to have an emotional side, but that's not the case. I like a balance, and I too think this first issue of Stormbringer achieves that. The problem for me arises when Simon goes overboard. For example, remember in Age of Wrath when Grimlock "died" protecting Magnus, and Magnus had this out-of-character crying-to-the-sky breakdown? I mean, you could almost see the tears streaming down his face. Now, if Magnus is the ultimate soldier, we just shouldn't be seeing that. That's called "going overboard" emotionally.
And here is where you ruin it. Where you could say, "Simon needs to write less melodramatic characters," or "Magnus is the ultimate soldier, so that's out of character for him (He seemed like quite the whiny pansy in TF:TM to me)", you say, "Magnus is a robot, so therefore his emotional reactions must be limited and mechanical"Furman needs to rein that tendency in. Its okay to display emotions but don't detract from the mechanical nature of the characters either.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
I shouldn't have to do a double take to make sure there weren't tears flowing from Magnus' optical sockets.Shanti418 wrote: And here is where you ruin it. Where you could say, "Simon needs to write less melodramatic characters," or "Magnus is the ultimate soldier, so that's out of character for him (He seemed like quite the whiny pansy in TF:TM to me)", you say, "Magnus is a robot, so therefore his emotional reactions must be limited and mechanical"
Omega Supreme? Is that you?Best First wrote:emotions - mental attribute.
mechanical - pyshical attribute.
correlation - negative.
Heh, yes. Although even Omega Supreme's monosyllabic speech and monodominant terminology is a result of emotional reasoning, as succinctly explained by his original profile:Yaya wrote:Omega Supreme? Is that you?Best First wrote:emotions - mental attribute.
mechanical - pyshical attribute.
correlation - negative.
Now there's a mechanical bot for ya!
He uses terminology that reflects both his military nature, his precision and desire for perfection in personal performance...values built on a foundation of full knowledge that he simply cannot and must not let his people down.His fellow Autobots consider him serious, even grim, but those with insight know the reason why: the enormity of the responsibility placed on Omega Supreme. He knows that should he fall in battle, chances are there will be no other Autobots left by that point to take over his role. His is a situation Omega Supreme finds both challenging and chilling. He would have it no other way.
Cindersaur, actually.Best First wrote:Flamefeather? Is that you?Yaya wrote:Omega Supreme? Is that you?Best First wrote:emotions - mental attribute.
mechanical - pyshical attribute.
correlation - negative.
Now there's a mechanical bot for ya!
i was kind of thinking/hoping that was the case, although Bludgeon's presence made/makes me unsure.BB Shockwave wrote:
May I just butt in, and note that no matter how much I'd like it - seeing as he's my second favourite Con - that purple guy in Bludgeon's cult with the fangs around his head is not Carnivac but Iguanus.
Explanation - 1. his colors are pink and dark purple - Carnivac's are pink, blue and gold.
2. he has two wheels on his back - Iguanus turned into a motorcycle
3. since all the other followers, save Bludgeon, are 1988 'humanoid' (monstroid, more like) Pretenders like Skullgrin, Finback, Bugly, Bomb-Burst, it'd be more logical that he is one of these, not a pretender beast...
As a random aside, the "Planet of the machine people" Spock sees a hologram of whilst on his trip looks allmost exactly like Cybertron, and Robo-Ilyria has a TF like voice. Endless cross-over fanfic (or even an Evolutions...) potential there. Not to mention that A Rage In Heaven rather shamelessly nicks the end of the first Trek film (except that Prime, unlike Decker, is returned after merging...)Legion wrote:Ugh.. i hate to site this... but the V'Ger machine from StarTrek:TMP gained sentience and asked "Is this all that I am? Is there nothing more?" and to try to seek answers to these questions it went about trying to find it's creator.
http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20060804.htmlinflatable dalek wrote:As for the Formies and religion- Charecters like Bludgeon, Mindwipe Bugly and ActionMasterNinjabloke have long standing spiritual leanings, so it makes sense for them to believe in Gods or dark forces (I'd even include Prime in that group, as his role as Matrix carrier makes him a sort of President and Pope combined). Peeps like Perceptor and Jetfire on the other hand would most likely be trying to find a scientific explanation for everything even if Primus came round for afternoon tea. In the end, like us they all believe a variety of different things, which is fine by me.
Thanks Josh! I do hope Carny turns up at some future issue, though...Josh wrote:BB Shockwave wrote: May I just butt in, and note that no matter how much I'd like it - seeing as he's my second favourite Con - that purple guy in Bludgeon's cult with the fangs around his head is not Carnivac but Iguanus.
*ding ding!*
we hath a winner :P
it is indeed iguanus not carnivac