An insecure writer? Never...Yaya wrote:He's pompous. Or maybe it's all for show and he's just insecure.
inflatable dalek wrote:The comic reviews I did at the time for Transformers Archive are basically a man watching his favourite puppy repeatedly getting run over by a car. And Costa's arrival was the driver coming out and stomping on the poor thing's mangled face. IDW took a title I'd previously have been prepared to give every chance too, and buggered it over a barrel so thoroughly it reached complete rock bottom and became unsalvagable. And that's the biggest shame of all.
I might have to find some way to parley this into a blog or something. I suspect, more and more, that there's some kind of cultural pressure here that Costa is parroting. You know the old, dreaded phrase: "it's a toy book." It's reflected by the way that the Seattle Times began its review of the first Bay movie with the words "we all knew it would be dumb." I honestly think that when Costa started work on the TFs, his enthusiasm ran out pretty quick (unlike a certain gushing fanfic tome-writer). He had people talking about how he "wrote about toys." There was something in his brain saying that these just weren't worth "real writing."
This is the flipside of comics becoming "respectable." Simon Furman wasn't about to win any Pulitzers for writing ANYTHING in the 80s. Oh sure, 2000 AD carried a veneer of cool and respectable in the comics community, but that wouldn't get you far outside such.
Now every comics writer is on the edge of cool. Hell, I did a graphic novel as my thesis in graduate school. So these young, hip McCostaDonoughs come in with ideas about how to spice up Transformers like unto Civil War or The Ultimates or other Cool New Take On Old Tropes.
What they discover: writing is hard. What they blame it on: fans, the nature of the work, etc. What we discover: these guys are no Grant Morrison, Mark Millar or J. Michael Straczynski, and until someone of that caliber who is that big of a fan (remember how freakishly deep Morrison's knowledge of the JLA was?) takes on the work, it will not be "new and hip and edgy."
Therefore we all realize that Furman's fun, action-packed, slightly cheeseball writing was far more enjoyable. The guy's a solid writer. He gets plot, he gets character, and he works well with artists. And I will not be surprised when he outsells even Barber and Roberts' titles.