Transfans interview with Bob Budiansky

News! About Transformers! Crazy! Post your TF news and rumours here for all the world (with the exception of certain rain forest tribes) to see. Please ensure that you read the guidelines before posting. Thanks.

Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide

Post Reply
User avatar
Denyer
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2155
Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
::Yesterday's model
Contact:
Transfans interview with Bob Budiansky

Post by Denyer » Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:15 pm

Spidey (not Jerusalem, the other one) has for you an interview with one of the fathers of TF fiction. :)

http://www.transfans.net/interviews_budiansky.php

User avatar
Kaylee
Big Honking Planet Eater
Posts:4071
Joined:Thu Oct 26, 2000 12:00 am
::More venomous than I appear
Location:Ashford, Kent, UK.
Contact:

Post by Kaylee » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:05 pm

He's a strange guy. I can't help but like him, especially for some of the flak he's taken, but he does rather sound like he doesn't care too much about the franchise (or at least has very little interest in it beyond a casual paycheque).

Very interesting read :up:

User avatar
Legion
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2739
Joined:Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 am
Location:The road to nowhere

Post by Legion » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:19 pm

Nice interview! :up:

Heh, everytime i read about Bob i like him more and more! And to think, he's essentially the creator of most of the characters that we know and love! It's kind mind boggling that he's so laid back about TFs when we're all dribbling over them (still).
Interesting his comment about essentially being begged to stay for months even tho his heart wasn't in it... unfortunately that is quite evident from his last few issues (wrestling micromasters for instance), which is a real shame imho as so many of his earlier issues were fantastic.
Also what i find interesting was that one of the key attractions for Bob was the TF/Human interaction element to the stories - something that i normally found very grating.

User avatar
Ozz
Help! I have a man for a head!
Posts:885
Joined:Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:00 pm
Location:Poland
Contact:

Post by Ozz » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:36 pm

The second cover is from #47, not 37. :)

User avatar
Shanti418
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2633
Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
Location:Austin, Texas

Post by Shanti418 » Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:56 pm

Nice interview! Much love to throwing out the Clone Saga in the word association part.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.

User avatar
Metal Vendetta
Big Honking Planet Eater
Posts:4950
Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
Location:Lahndan, innit

Post by Metal Vendetta » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:45 am

Great stuff.

His review of TFTM was brilliant :lol:
I would have waited a ******* eternity for this!!!!
Impactor returns 2.0, 28th January 2010

User avatar
Predabot
Big Honking Planet Eater
Posts:3119
Joined:Sun Apr 06, 2003 11:00 pm
::Scraplet
Location:Northern sweden

Post by Predabot » Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:40 am

Awesomeness in a can! :) He also spills the beans that both Jim shooter and Denny O'neil themselves(!) has had a hand or two in the creation of the Transformers!
Metal Vendetta wrote:Great stuff.

His review of TFTM was brilliant :lol:
But surely the animation wasn't that bad?? :eek: The other things might be true tho... :lurk:

Also... he's got a daughter..? :D

User avatar
Best First
King of the, er, Kingdom.
Posts:9750
Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
Location:Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by Best First » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:05 am

one of the things that strucjk me was how ambivilant he was a bout the eturn to Cybertron stuff - which we all think is ace - he just wanted to get back to Bomber Bill and co as fast as possible.

Frankly i love how "whatever" he is about it all - its kind of refreshig to see someone looking at he fans as a bunch of people who take something far too serioulsy because, clearly, we are.

Also much respect to the sick genius that came up with the notion of the smelting pool.
Image

User avatar
Denyer
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2155
Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
::Yesterday's model
Contact:

Post by Denyer » Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:51 pm

Ozz wrote:The second cover is from #47, not 37. :)
Sorry. Bleary and painkillers.
Predabot wrote:He also spills the beans that both Jim shooter and Denny O'neil themselves(!) has had a hand or two in the creation of the Transformers!
Been known for quite a while.
Predabot wrote:surely the animation wasn't that bad?
Compared to the series, and the opening sequence is particularly well-done. Notsomuch compared to other animated films.

User avatar
Brendocon
Big Honking Planet Eater
Posts:5299
Joined:Tue Sep 19, 2000 11:00 pm
Location:UK

Post by Brendocon » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:22 pm

Best First wrote:Frankly i love how "whatever" he is about it all - its kind of refreshig to see someone looking at he fans as a bunch of people who take something far too serioulsy because, clearly, we are.
Defo.
Grrr. Argh.

User avatar
Shanti418
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2633
Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
Location:Austin, Texas

Post by Shanti418 » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:56 pm

Maybe he's just a non chalant guy.

Hey Bob, your Return to Cybertron was AWESOME!!! It's loved by millions!

Bob : "Whatever."

Hey Bob, your Clone Saga arc (during which he was Spidey EIC) was CRAPPY!!! It's hated by millions!

Bob : "Whavever."
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.

User avatar
BB Shockwave
Insane Decepticon Commander
Posts:1877
Joined:Wed Jun 09, 2004 11:00 pm
Location:Hungary, Budapest
Contact:

Post by BB Shockwave » Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:17 pm

Umm.. so Bob wrote the Spiderman Clone saga? :eek: Dunn 'cause I only marginally read Spidey in the past.

Funny how he doesn't even remembers many of the characters he practically 'invented' and gave them character... but I guess, as much as he worked on it, he never truly liked (or understood) the aspect of giant transforming robots. After all, if it wasn't for Bob, we still wouldn't have a TF origin story other then "life came from naturally evolving cogs". :)

I was also suprised Marvel US didn't know about Simon and his run of TF UK...
Image

"I've come to believe you are working for the enemy, Vervain. There is no other explanation... for your idiocy." (General Woundwort)

User avatar
Shanti418
Over Pompous Autobot Commander
Posts:2633
Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
Location:Austin, Texas

Post by Shanti418 » Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:49 pm

Ahh, he wasn't as much to blame as I originally blurted out, I suppose.

He was Spidey EIC during that year and a half or so where different Marvel families had different EICs.

But he inherited the Clone Saga, and got transferred out of the Spidey buisness before they even revealed Ben to be the Clone after all.

But my impression from reading Glenn Greenberg's The Life of Reilly (an excellent read, btw, if you like Spidey, want to know what happened in the Clone Saga w/o buying back issues, and also want to know exactly what was happening behind the scenes to cause that train wreck) is that his stewardship was marked by indecision and a lack of direction, which did nothing but stretch out the Clone Saga needlessly and piss off a lot of fans.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.

Post Reply