Scraplet wrote:Obfleur wrote:iTunes is my worst ******* enemy. **** that ****.
Couldn't agree more! Nasty bloatware that continually crashes my computer with its nasty updates. The apple support forums tell you to waste an entire evening removing everything apple from your PC and reloading it, just to make the damn thing work again. But what really makes me choke is the apple fanboys responses on the support forums -"oh, thank you, thats great, now its all working again". **** you, apple, if you think I'll ever thank you for destroying my evening due to your crap, de-stablising updates.
Steve Jobs. Its sad when anyone dies an early and tragic death, but I can't help but feel this is all a bit "Princess Diana". James Dyson has had a similar impact in terms of consumer changes in his industry, but we are unlikely to see people crying over their vacuum cleaners if he dies tomorrow. Wangari Maathai also died recently and I didn't see a significant report in the mainstream media, outside of the liberal press. Its genuinely tragic when people who are really changing the world for the better don't get any notice. Really, I shouldn't know who Steve Jobs is, but he ran a company that could afford to fund his personality cult.
I understand what you're saying, and I'm not implying for a minute that you should like Mr. J or that the media outpouring isn't getting over-the-top, however the impact of (particularly early) Apple products on home computing is very great. I'd dispute Jobs being less influential than Dyson and Maathai based on sheer numbers and scale.
Dyson invented a slightly more effective vacuum cleaner, Maathai was an admirable Kenyan activist, Apple Computers helped forge mainstream computing: their evolution of the GUI from Xerox to a usable, convention-driven 'desktop' interface is still used (almost unchanged) on all PCs to this day. Steve Jobs was behind that.
Without Apple, PCs would still exist and would still be important but the PC you understand today (point-and-click, OK buttons in dialog boxes and files-and-folder based management of documents for example) all comes from Apple Computers.
Literally the basics of all modern PCs stem from the first Apple systems, all sculpted by Jobs' vision of what a computer should be and how it should work and his excellent development team, all legends themselves in software development.
Love him, loath him or not really care: that is surely a collossal legacy when over 2,000,000,000 people use a paradigm of technology you sculpted and molded.
I appreciate it's not as emotive as being a great activist but the scale of influence is vast, the knock-on effects over the last 25 years are huge (what would the Internet, with all its influence, look like without the Apple-style PC desktop paradigm influencing it?)
Kinda like being the guy who took the town pump and turned it into the tap in your kitchen: you didn't invent it, but you 'fixed' it, made it mainstream and influenced a ridiculous number of people and after events. Worthy, I suppose one would say.
Not worth canonising, I absolutely agree, but I'd say definitely worthy. But then I'm biaised, I worked in IT for years and I do genuinely agree with homage for the roots of modern PCs.
Footnote: For the record, it is my understanding Steve Jobs was a prick to work with, had dubious business practices and never (publicly) donated to charity. iTunes does, indeed, also suck badly on PCs.