Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:Obfleur wrote:I just think it's a bit to silly. Bond, IMO, is pure comedy.
His car gets cut in half, he continues driving. whats silly about it?
I dont get the logic, take MI, or Bourne, or xXx for that matter, they all have moments that are impposible or silly - Bond does them with class tho, and thats the difference between them all.
It's silly because Bond is so ******* over the top all the time.
He drives around in his half car - he ******* parks it on a bridge - at the very second he parks it on the bridge there's a boat with a wedding going under it - he jumps down on the boat with the wedding and sort of lands in the cake (if I remember correctly) - tied to the big wedding boat is a smaller motor boat which Bonds steals so he can chase the bad guy.
Me and my mate were both going "This is some silly ******* ****." (I believe he also at some point in the movie drove a motor cycle, a fire tuck and probably also used some sort of flying transportation).
Add to that all the awful villains he has fought, like Goldfinger and Oddjob.
Goldfinger dips ladys in gold or whatever - and Obbjob has a tophat that can decapitate statues.
I don't get why you're comparing Bond to those movies (it's not like I like those movies or anything), but here we go:
The MI movies are nothing special.
The first Bourne is quite all right. The seond one is **** (and I haven't seen the third)
xXx is ******* **** (all of them).
Bond and the other movies listed above are silly and brain dead movies that you forget ten minutes after you've seen them.
The only movie I would pay money to see would be the first Bourne.
I'd rather take a **** in my mouth than watch another Bond movie though, 'cause those are the worst.
If people called Bond "fun, brain dead entertainment" I wouldn't mind.
But people are treating Bond like it's a holy cow or something. I can not for the life of me understand how anyone can find Bond exciting.
It's just silly ****!
IMO of course
