Looking Glass London
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
My Criminology Professor today was saying that wherever you go in London, you're in the view of a couple if not several cameras at all times. Some of them even have the capability to talk to you and tell you to stop donig whatever it is you're doing.
My classmates were shocked, and my Prof said that since England has never had a Bill of Rights, people don't really know what they're missing, they're fine with it, and they don't view it as intrustive.
Is that true? What's your opinion of the extent to which law enforcement should intrude upon the lives of everyday law abiding citizens?
My classmates were shocked, and my Prof said that since England has never had a Bill of Rights, people don't really know what they're missing, they're fine with it, and they don't view it as intrustive.
Is that true? What's your opinion of the extent to which law enforcement should intrude upon the lives of everyday law abiding citizens?
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
Here in America, I don't think the problem would be "I'm worried about someone watching me do bad things," so much as it would be, "I don't trust the government with that level of survelliance."Brendocon wrote: It's one of those rare occasions where "if you're not doing anything wrong, why be worried?" actually applies.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- Eline
- Help! I have a man for a head!
- Posts:877
- Joined:Sun Apr 22, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location:Delft, the Netherlands
- Contact:
I live in a cute small town, we do have a few cameras in "scary places" though, like the tunnel under the railway etc. It does make me feel a bit safer when I walk there at night, and I have never really thought about these cameras being misused and their tapes sold.
Once I saw a documentary about the London cameras, and they looked quite effective to me.
It is of course very tricky to decide between security and personal freedom, but I assume that the London police have good rules and regulations about using the cameras. Is that really the case?
Once I saw a documentary about the London cameras, and they looked quite effective to me.
It is of course very tricky to decide between security and personal freedom, but I assume that the London police have good rules and regulations about using the cameras. Is that really the case?
- Metal Vendetta
- Big Honking Planet Eater
- Posts:4950
- Joined:Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:00 am
- Location:Lahndan, innit
Thats fine today. I too don't worry about being filmed now. But I do worry about the tool we're handing to a potentially more corrupt or distastful political administration of the future. Like ID cards, it supplies all the neccesary tools for a fantastic police state.Brendocon wrote: It's one of those rare occasions where "if you're not doing anything wrong, why be worried?" actually applies.
We just need to be stoopid enough to fall for the bull**** that will let such a political framework exist.....*cough*waronterror*cough*.
___________________________________
http://www.tiananmen.co.uk/index.php
http://www.tiananmen.co.uk/index.php
Heard on the radio this morning that there's a roundabout in Hammersmith that's got 29 CCTV cameras trained on it, due to police, private, commercial and other businesses.
Apparently, there's 5 types of camera in use, and it's the most heavily surveiled junction in the world.
Then again, this is information gleaned from local radio (but not local to Hammersmith), so dubiousness prevails...
Apparently, there's 5 types of camera in use, and it's the most heavily surveiled junction in the world.
Then again, this is information gleaned from local radio (but not local to Hammersmith), so dubiousness prevails...
I reassure myself with the fact that our current police force and government can't even get the simplest things right, so the notion of them being able to credibly organise Teh Big Surveillance is a bit of a stretch.Scraplet wrote:But I do worry about the tool we're handing to a potentially more corrupt or distastful political administration of the future.
Grrr. Argh.