Why, Tottenham, why?

[snarl]

That's dog****.

Suppose we didn't play - we would have points deducted, otherwise Gibson sues the F.A. quicker then you can say 'Arsenal are *****'.

Say we get points deducted to an extent that we fall out of the Uefa places - we are then ****** TO ****. TV Money, sposorship, playe purchases - ALL ****** TO ****.

I also think that football is corrup to the extent that if anybody ever spoke up about somebody being a ****, that **** would have enough dirt on somebody else, who in turn...

then the whole thing would fall to pieces.

Again, did you watch the game?

We DID NOT COMPETE, we got STEAMED!

Remember, West Ham's team was weakened. This team has been BATTERED comprehensively several times this season - yet it was they who outplayed us. Yes, we did have some good chances. We ddi not compete. Highlights offer a wonderful, skewed perspective of things.

[Best First]

Thats one perspective. The other one is that if the F.A have no input from Pl clubs then it's possible to assume they would be to detached from the game to serve it or understand some of the more delicate requirements. Tech

yes, but that perspective is nonsense. That's like saying every time my company takes on a project we should put our clients staff on the payrole or we can't talk to them. How does not having a member of the PL on the baord preclude the FA from udnerstadning what is going on in the PL or intereacting with its memebers, just don't give them a frigging say in running that FA because its a clear conflict of interests. The FA is not there to serve the PL its there ro serve the good of English football which are oftn two very distinct things.

No serious allegations have ever been made and any comments about his work with the FA from other clubs have always been very positive. If there was even a hint that it was an Advantage to Arsenal most of the other big clubs would cause a huge stink ove rit.

OK, you appear to NOT UNDERSTAND. I'm not talking about Arsenal gaing an advantage, i'm talking about the PL, as a whole having representation and leveareg on th ebaord of the organisation that is suposed to regulate them, do you see?

So what the other PL clubs think is if anything an endorsement of the fact that there is a conflict of interests.