I like comics, How 'bout you?
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
- Best First
- King of the, er, Kingdom.
- Posts:9750
- Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location:Manchester, UK
- Contact:
- Optimus Prime Rib
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2215
- Joined:Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:00 pm
- Location:College Station, TX
- Contact:
Cyclops has been brilliant ever since the whole 'no more mutants' thing started. It gave his character real purpose and his own identity. It's been a relatively natural (for Marvel) build up of his character to get to this point.
I don't think he will die, but I'm sure he will be taken of the table or a while. Maybe imprisoned or something. Pushed aside so that Wolverine can lead the X-Men in full *spit*
I don't think he will die, but I'm sure he will be taken of the table or a while. Maybe imprisoned or something. Pushed aside so that Wolverine can lead the X-Men in full *spit*
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
I think that's the exact thing though: they're kind of pushed him into this super duper, extra-hard-as-nails-makes-tough-decisions box. That was always his character, but now that's basically the only dimension of his character (post no more mutants). So killing him is kind of the only way to reset Cyclops (save the OMG what have I done? a la Stark in Civil War).Hound wrote:Cyclops has been brilliant ever since the whole 'no more mutants' thing started. It gave his character real purpose and his own identity. It's been a relatively natural (for Marvel) build up of his character to get to this point.
I don't think he will die, but I'm sure he will be taken of the table or a while. Maybe imprisoned or something. Pushed aside so that Wolverine can lead the X-Men in full *spit*
Whether by death or by dissolution however, I think Emma/Scott is done with, esp. given this. I think this is like the X-Men version of Dark Reign. That had the effect of mopping up all the stuff from the last several years for a new, classic status quo: Thor/Cap/Iron Man with friends in a Heroic Age! So here, Cyclops/X-Force/Utopia, even Hope....I could all see them coming off the board and moving back to a Prof X/X-Mansion status quo, with Phoenix Force effects (and perhaps Wanda helping clean up her mess?) creating new mutants in future births.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
The latest AvX was actually pretty good.
But god damn this series has cemented my hatred for Wolverine. His hypocrisy (even Beast is realising this and he is the master hypocrite of the X-Men) and his new found 'think of the children ********' seems to utterly fly in the face of what was once a fairly interesting character.
Now it turns out that Wolverine helped found the original X-Men or some ******** like that in the recently announced 'First X-Men'.
But god damn this series has cemented my hatred for Wolverine. His hypocrisy (even Beast is realising this and he is the master hypocrite of the X-Men) and his new found 'think of the children ********' seems to utterly fly in the face of what was once a fairly interesting character.
Now it turns out that Wolverine helped found the original X-Men or some ******** like that in the recently announced 'First X-Men'.
- Best First
- King of the, er, Kingdom.
- Posts:9750
- Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location:Manchester, UK
- Contact:
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
At first I read that as "He discovered America is actually Jesus."Hound wrote:Wolverine also invented burritos, wrote most of The Beatles best songs, discovered America and is actually Jesus
And wrote the book of love.
And will stop the rain.
And will drive you home.
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
In this version, instead of cleaning the temple of moneychangers, he gives them tax breaks.Hot Shot wrote:It's funny, because the rest of the world is crucifying us. :PAt first I read that as "He discovered America is actually Jesus."
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
You know, it has occurred to about one person in the history of American Christian rhetoric that "maybe 1st-century Roman Palestine is a bad context to make broad comparisons to 20th-21st century America."Shanti418 wrote:In this version, instead of cleaning the temple of moneychangers, he gives them tax breaks.Hot Shot wrote:It's funny, because the rest of the world is crucifying us. :PAt first I read that as "He discovered America is actually Jesus."
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
Back to comic news...
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/marvel- ... alpha.html
Don't. get. at. all. So you unmarried him, deaged him, have a "without Uncle Ben, no power/responsiblity schtick" in Scarlet Spider, have a teenage non Peter Park Spidey in Ultimate, and NOW you want to add a teenage sidekick to Spiderman a "Batman to his Robin" as if that's a good thing? What exactly is the point of that, and at what point do you ever actually get rid of this guy? Why are you going to piss all over your OMD spoils by forcing Peter into a position where he IS the mature, old voice of reason, restraint, discretion, etc against a young n'er do well? I mean SERIOUSLY.
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/marvel- ... alpha.html
Don't. get. at. all. So you unmarried him, deaged him, have a "without Uncle Ben, no power/responsiblity schtick" in Scarlet Spider, have a teenage non Peter Park Spidey in Ultimate, and NOW you want to add a teenage sidekick to Spiderman a "Batman to his Robin" as if that's a good thing? What exactly is the point of that, and at what point do you ever actually get rid of this guy? Why are you going to piss all over your OMD spoils by forcing Peter into a position where he IS the mature, old voice of reason, restraint, discretion, etc against a young n'er do well? I mean SERIOUSLY.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- Best First
- King of the, er, Kingdom.
- Posts:9750
- Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location:Manchester, UK
- Contact:
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
James Robinson on He-Man? Color me intrigued,
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=38505
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=38505
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
Oh yeah. Taking He Man totally serious? GENIUS.bumblemusprime wrote:James Robinson on He-Man? Color me intrigued,
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=38505
So I'm thinking of starting to read a new series in trades. The nominees are....
1. BKV's Ex Machina
2. Terry Moore's Echo
3. Jeff Smith's RASL.
Anybody have an opinion? Bumble, I've got you down for a large neon sign flashing "RASL FTW" until you tell me otherwise.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
I refer you to this erudite gent:Shanti418 wrote:Oh yeah. Taking He Man totally serious? GENIUS.bumblemusprime wrote:James Robinson on He-Man? Color me intrigued,
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=38505
So I'm thinking of starting to read a new series in trades. The nominees are....
1. BKV's Ex Machina
2. Terry Moore's Echo
3. Jeff Smith's RASL.
Anybody have an opinion? Bumble, I've got you down for a large neon sign flashing "RASL FTW" until you tell me otherwise.
http://www.intergalacticmedicineshow.co ... rticle=034
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
Marvel NOW anybody?
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=39525
So it looks like the Regenesis roster split will be undone in under a year.
The notion of Bendis & Immonen doing a story where the original X-Men land slap bang in the current sounds both amazing and awful in equal measures. Will depend how long the series lasts as to how far over the shark that makes it.
Still, they made it about ten years before finding a way of bringing Jean back. That's quite impressive.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=39525
So it looks like the Regenesis roster split will be undone in under a year.
The notion of Bendis & Immonen doing a story where the original X-Men land slap bang in the current sounds both amazing and awful in equal measures. Will depend how long the series lasts as to how far over the shark that makes it.
Still, they made it about ten years before finding a way of bringing Jean back. That's quite impressive.
- bumblemusprime
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2370
- Joined:Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location:GoboTron
"It's 2012?"
"Yeah. Like, 2012."
"Whoa. 2012."
"Whoa."
"Yeah."
"What just happened? Did you see what just happened?"
"Yeah. Like, 2012."
"Whoa. 2012."
"Whoa."
"Yeah."
"What just happened? Did you see what just happened?"
Best First wrote:I didn't like it. They don't have mums, or dads, or children. And they turn into stuff. And they don't eat Monster Munch or watch Xena: Warrior Princess. Or do one big poo in the morning and another one in the afternoon. I bet they weren't even excited by and then subsequently disappointed by Star Wars Prequels. Or have a glass full of spare change near their beds. That they don't have.
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
Seems like a bunch of crap to me. Instead of some sort of single unifying idea of what should be done (which, for better or worse, DC DID have), they're throwing crap against the wall. "Hey Bendis, you trade place with Hickman, Hickman, you go over here where Bendis was, and let's put that guy that wrote XXXombies out front. And then let's bring back the original X-Men: we don't need to cyberpunch any continuity walls, we'll just have Mephisto take care of this one again. And Joe Q, maybe you want to f*** around with some character designs? Then let's release some comics for the new reader and call it "Point One," er, "NOW!""
As far as that picture: So we're adding Ultimate Cap and Ultimate Nick Fury, making Cyclops a LITERAL Cyclops, making Iron Man and Thor "more blacker," giving Hulk a robot sidekick (which is totally ridiculous unless it has like the soul of Bruce Banner in it or something)???
I will give them this though: they are totally all in on this "Everything we make in movie form turns to gold therefore here's Guardians of the Galaxy and Rrrrrooocket Raccoooonnn!" Because you know, after the Avengers, the wise-cracking Han Solo raccoon is their most bankable property.
As far as that picture: So we're adding Ultimate Cap and Ultimate Nick Fury, making Cyclops a LITERAL Cyclops, making Iron Man and Thor "more blacker," giving Hulk a robot sidekick (which is totally ridiculous unless it has like the soul of Bruce Banner in it or something)???
I will give them this though: they are totally all in on this "Everything we make in movie form turns to gold therefore here's Guardians of the Galaxy and Rrrrrooocket Raccoooonnn!" Because you know, after the Avengers, the wise-cracking Han Solo raccoon is their most bankable property.
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.
- Best First
- King of the, er, Kingdom.
- Posts:9750
- Joined:Tue Oct 17, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location:Manchester, UK
- Contact:
- Shanti418
- Over Pompous Autobot Commander
- Posts:2633
- Joined:Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location:Austin, Texas
Best First wrote:Quite like the look of some of that - Uncanny Avengers sounds like the mutts.
Can't quite buy into the concept that the current marvel U is worse than one where the Sentinels killed EVERYONE though.
I don't know...on the one hand, the entire world ISN'T a despotic post Apocalyptic wasteland filled with death and sadness. On the other hand, Jubilee's a vampire, people leave their kids alone with Wolverine, and Beast is blue. So potato, poTATo. :P
Best First wrote:I thought we could just meander between making well thought out points, being needlessly immature, provocative and generalist, then veer into caring about constructive debate and make a few valid points, act civil for a bit, then lower the tone again, then act offended when we get called on it, then dictate what it is and isn't worth debating, reinterpret a few of my own posts through a less offensive lens, then jaunt down whatever other path our seemingly volatile mood took us in.