Saw.

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:32 am

Why is this piece of crap movie so ******* hyped?

Why did they make a Saw 2?

Why are they making a Saw 3?

Why?

Metal Vendetta · Post by **Metal Vendetta** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:34 am

They're cheap to make and people will watch them?

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:41 am

These people need to be shot.

Post by **spiderfrommars** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:56 am

I thought it was fun.

Well, until the last 10 mins which was total nonsense.

angloconvoy · Post by **angloconvoy** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:23 am

The only clever thing about the movie was how they made you think it was going somewhere up until the end where they threw in that amazing twist. And by amazing twist I mean nonsensical rubbish. Saw 2 (what I watched of it) was just as bad, and had a lot of actors in it who were like bargain basement versions of other actors. Don't worry though, I didn't pay to see either of them. I may have let the filmmakers waste my time, but I didn't line their pockets for the pleasure.

Metal Vendetta · Post by **Metal Vendetta** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:42 am

I went to see Saw at the cinema and it was fun and quite creepy. Haven't really bothered with Saw 2.

Brendocon · Post by **Brendocon** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:16 pm

They're making a sequel to White Noise. Nathan Fillion and Katee Sackoff are the leads.

[/unrelated].

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:21 pm

Just give me ******* Snakes on a plane.

angloconvoy · Post by **angloconvoy** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:27 pm

Wait? Cap'n Mal and Starbuck? I hope its not as **** as its inevitably going to be.

and ob, don't you mean "mother *******" snakes on a plane"?

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:28 pm

Sorry. Of course I do

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:28 pm

I liked saw te saw end

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:29 pm

People told me that Saw was "genious" and "smart", which made me think "oh my god. This is gonna be like Alien, or The Shining or Hitchock!"
But it was just your random crap horror flick with a dude in a red dress and a pig mask.
Nothing spectacular at all.

angloconvoy · Post by **angloconvoy** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:32 pm

I did actually enjoy a lot of it, moreso than seven at any rate. The ending absolutely ruined it for me though.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:34 pm

whats wrong with the ending. the guy had been made to kill everyonem, which is plot consistent as thats what the saw guy always wants his victims to do.
And the saw guy was watching, again consistent as thats what he always does and gets off on.

Makes perfect sense.

angloconvoy · Post by **angloconvoy** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:38 pm

It was more that when they revealed who the saw guy was I didn't find it believable that he could have set up half the stuff he did.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:47 pm

the saw guy was the guy on the floor of the cell, what couldnt he have set up?

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:49 pm

Jigsawbitch was a cancer patient that the doctor treated, if my memory serves me correctly.

Movies are supposed to be unrealistic, I understand that. You cant nitpick everything.
But Saw was to much.
It also had horrible acting.

SPOILERS OH HELLZOR!!!!!!!!

Dude, I warned you.

...

It's just too much that Jigsaw was laying on the floor all the time. Absolutely still, face down, for at least six hours.

And a bunch of other crap.

Pissin' Poonani · Post by **Pissin' Poonani** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:50 pm

I enjoyed Saw, but what bothered me was how Jigsaw was able to lay on the floor for the entire duration of the film, wearing nothing but pants and a vest, and no one noticed him breathing (or he was able to control his breathing so that it was completely undetectable).

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:52 pm

Pissin' Poonani wrote: wearing nothing but pants and a vest

I just imagined Jigsaw as a biker with a mullet.

Pissin' Poonani · Post by **Pissin' Poonani** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:56 pm

Obfleur wrote:
Pissin' Poonani wrote: wearing nothing but pants and a vest
I just imagined Jigsaw as a biker with a mullet.

Well, if it hadn't been for the cancer and the descent into serial-killer style madness, maybe that image would have come to fruition. Alas, t'was not meant to be.

Post by **spiderfrommars** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:26 pm

I just thought when he sawed his foot off it was bollocks.

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:39 pm

I liked how the director tried to show that the doctor hade gone insane "Okey.. you have been locked up in this room for six hours and absolutely nothing has happened to you. No insanity, no desperation, no nothing.
We'll have to change that *throws a fist full of flour in the doctors face* There.. all done. Now try and act crazy!"

angloconvoy · Post by **angloconvoy** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 3:06 pm

Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:the saw guy was the guy on the floor of the cell, what couldnt he have set up?

Well he had an awful lot of info for someone who was just a cancer patient. And amazing physical superpowers, especially for someone dying of cancer. I think it was just because everyone said it was clever that I felt a bit let down. There was nothing to make me believe the guy could have access to everything he did.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:13 pm

I took it at face value - it looks a bit tacky and cheap but overall ive seen so much worse. its just sort of average.

I mean how come final destination is on film 3?

I liked the sado face clamps and stuff in Saw, at appeals to a dark side of me, muhahahaha

Shanti418 · Post by **Shanti418** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:26 pm

I thought Saw was a decent enough horror rollercoaster, save the painful, squirm in your seat, are we watching MST3K, acting of Cary Elwes.

Saw 2 was completly stupid and bad.

BB Shockwave · Post by **BB Shockwave** » Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:34 pm

Obfleur wrote:Why is this piece of crap movie so ******* hyped?

Why did they make a Saw 2?

Why are they making a Saw 3?

Why?

It sounds like 'Jaws' and they want to make as many movies as Jaws had. My guess?

Post by **spiderfrommars** » Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:20 am

Saw 3D?

Saw: The Revenge?

divebomb · Post by **divebomb** » Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:08 am

Impactor returns 2.0
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:13:pm Post subject:
I took it at face value - it looks a bit tacky and cheap but overall ive seen so much worse. its just sort of average.

I mean how come final destination is on film 3?

I went to see final destination 3 last night because the missus wanted to see it, and I have to admit it was okay. Clever set up and some of the grossest (is that a word??!!) deaths in the series. Not wanting to give to much away, if you're ever in a drive through and someone beeps you to move quicker, just bloody do it! Also it has compounded my fear of rollercoasters, so there goes another 10 years where I can't do anything on theme park trips!

TransFans.co.uk

Saw.

Re: Saw.