Thats what should have been in the credits of every DH story since the first series. Si got shafted.
![Sad :(](images/smilies/frown.gif)
By the way, next time we have a get together I'll bring my What If issue down for you to have a ganders. It's mint!
Moderators:Best First, spiderfrommars, IronHide
Yes. If you want them immediately, in a tidy format, then PM me, oh great one.Best First wrote:are there scans online?
Well, I don't know really. I like it, but others don't. I think the best thing to do, to finnally settle it, or give some kinda finger to point with in future arguments about such things, is to post both designs, classic Green Puffy ( no v2 allowed. heh heh) and DH2 on a big designer message-board.
The notion that the generic bag of crap that is DH2 is somehow a better design that DH1 is hilarious by the way.
Karl Lynch wrote:Most every body I've spoken to who knows of DH for some reason considers DHII to be more entertaining (probably to do with the age thing, most people I know were teenagers then so DHII with the random smashing and generic superheroness would probably appeal more than well-written stories and characterisation).
Hence DHII will feature to some degree in what is 'reimagined'.
I mean, DH being redone might stand a chance but when you run from the outset with DHII you know you're in trouble. Furman must be turning in his grave...
...which I've just dug... >.>
{loads shotgun and disappears outside mysteriously}
I believe so.Predabot wrote:Hey! Isn't that colorated by Josh, who's done some posting here and on other TF-sites?
Nope. they're more likely to just call DH2 DH, as it saves them all the 2's, among other things.Scraplet wrote:If they wanted to re-do DH2, then wouldn't they say DH2?
I think you mean 'coloured'. In fact, I think you mean coloured almost every time you say that. Colorated, AFAIK, means to give an image a dark-stained, slightly grainy look. Doesn't it?Predabot wrote:colorated
I think i'll settle for having read comics for a couple of decades now and being fairly sure that a generic musslebound torso with a horned head on top is not a good char design.Predabot wrote:Well, I don't know really. I like it, but others don't. I think the best thing to do, to finnally settle it, or give some kinda finger to point with in future arguments about such things, is to post both designs, classic Green Puffy ( no v2 allowed. heh heh) and DH2 on a big designer message-board.
The notion that the generic bag of crap that is DH2 is somehow a better design that DH1 is hilarious by the way.
uh-huh...The one that gets most votes, will of course gain much proof of said designs supremacy.
Not so baffling when you consider the stereotypical audience... which, unfortunately, is a stereotype because it exists in fairly large quantity, even if it is shrinking due to dearth of new ideas...jboyler wrote:The comic industry in general, and Marvel in particular, has a baffling preoccupation with superhero comics.
Ah. If you (or anyone) could dump 'em to denyer@tfarchive.com they'd be gratefully received.Predabot wrote:If you want them immediately, in a tidy format, then PM me, oh great one.
And I always thought it would have made sense to keep Spratt along with Tuck. There would have been lots of dynamics - Sprat wanting to keep DH2 on the path of DH (business), Tuck suporting the 'adventurer' side of DH2. Lots of arguments and room for humor. I wouldn't mind seeing DH2 back if they were able to do things a little differently like that.spiderfrommars wrote:It was not fitting. It was a disgusting treatment of Furman's established character IMO. Obviously his breasts weren't big enough.Predabot wrote:
Also, Pratt was not among the possible bussiness-partners at the time, since he met a fitting end in the original DH2 mini.
Well, this month #12 has been released. And since the winning character are supposed to be in #16, I'd probably say january 2006.Scraplet wrote:Is it still a December release, Preds??