Isn't there a timelord moral issue with using the time vortex to erase the Daleks from existence? Kind of like why the Doctor never went back and destroyed the Daleks before they became a threat?Karl Lynch wrote:I just can't figure it out... its really confusing
timelords: we fought a huge war against the daleks that (appeared to) wipe out half the galaxy and took us all out in the process!
rose: oooh look the TARDIS made me into a god for 5 minutes (after which time I would have died) but long enough to destroy the daleks and bring back everyone who died!
timelords: bollocks... why didn't we think of that?? we could have sacrified just one of us instead of all of us and half the universe! oh well... live and learn... er... wait...?
it makes my brain hurt!
Rose's action was pretty much error correction. The Daleks fought in the Time War, lost, but the Emperor survived, went back in time and created a new breed of Daleks that was "never meant to exist" (a biased person could say, though "meant to exist" implies an acceptance of fate/destiny and claiming that something that has happened wasn't meant to contradicts that belief... oh look, I've gone cross-eyed), and Rose just sort of wiped out all the Daleks from that point on.
It's the difference between wiping out a race's epilogue, rather than their entire existence. Or, to use a ropy analogy, George Lucas choosing whether he should defile Star Wars by just making three **** new films or pissing over the DVD releases of the originals as well...
