girls are evil!!

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:40 pm

why?

because you've you've all been holding out on me! why didn't you tell me foundation was sooo ******* awesome before?!

now my skin is nice, smooth and my complexion looks clear and bright!

infected chicken pox, the usual adolescence skin-oil problems and a very pale complexion don't leave you with very nice skin

im slowly getting tanned though... next thing to do is book a nice facial and waxing...

Narcissus, roll over!

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:44 pm

whats the term?

metrosexual? - not sure if im that vain, but I do use skin products to make sure I look good.

dont moisturise my hands or anything tho.

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:03 pm

lightweight!

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:06 pm

well I dont moisturise, but I do lube on lonly nights...

Metal Vendetta · Post by **Metal Vendetta** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:09 pm

My best mate used foundation all through school, probably still does. Myself, a bit of eyeliner's all I need

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:09 pm

what, doesn't everybody?

Master_Fwiffo · Post by **Master_Fwiffo** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:12 pm

THATS your reasoning? Dude, I can prove it to you mathmatically!

Girls require Time and Money.
So:
Girls = Time x Money
Now that we know that Time is money, so Time = Money. Using substitution,
Girls = Money x Money or Girls = Money^2

Now we also know that Money is the root of all evil, or Money = (root)Evil

So Girls = (root)Evil^2

Or just Girls = Evil.

In short.

Girls = Time x Money
Girls = Money x Money = Money^2
Girls = (root)Evil^2
Girls = Evil

Ta Da!

Yes, I know it's old. Its still funny.

-edit- Apparently, this board does not support the (root) sign.

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:41 pm

Great to hear you're feeling good, Karl!

And from what I've heard of it, being metrosexual doesn't sound half bad. A shame it's "out of fashion" again already. But who cares.

I do think guys miss out on a lot of girl things.

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:54 pm

nothing metrosexual here, babe. It's a word to describe het guys trying to be gay

bit pointless really, as I maintain in a few million years all straight boys will have evolved into gays anyway...

Luckily as nobody can disprove this theory I have a chance of getting in tought in schools...

Optimus Prime Rib · Post by **Optimus Prime Rib** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:00 pm

Karl Lynch wrote: bit pointless really, as I maintain in a few million years all straight boys will have evolved into gays anyway...

Unfortunately, at that point, mankind will cease to evolve unless women rule the world and force perfectly happy gay men into having sex with them.. or at least having a little private time with a cup

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:12 pm

Karl Lynch wrote:nothing metrosexual here, babe. It's a word to describe het guys trying to be gay

Yep, even though I try, I know I'll probably never succeed. We can't all be as marvellous as you, Karl!

* Sarcasm free post brought to you by Dylan

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:26 pm

Karl Lynch wrote: bit pointless really, as I maintain in a few million years all straight boys will have evolved into gays anyway...

I think we will al be Bi-Sexual to be honest.

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:31 pm

Nope, I've got a really old book here (I wrote it 20 minutes ago) which says otherwise. It also states that wearing watches with the face on the inside of your wrist is a sin.

editted cos i cant spell

Obfleur · Post by **Obfleur** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:40 pm

Karl Lynch wrote:a nice facial

Bukake-style!

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:44 pm

i always think, but cant follow through... due to my upbringing of course.

why should we not have the ablity to fancy either sex, fall in love or have sex?

essentially were similar bar a few bits underneath, I find it hard to explain but sometimes it seems so clear, i feel stupid to say im straight. to say im one orientation? how daft, im just a human, I can understand there might be inherit ideas in my brain to re-produce sure, but sex and love are different things...

yeah man, were all gonna Bi one day. free love and all that!

Optimus Prime Rib · Post by **Optimus Prime Rib** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:50 pm

Obfleur wrote:
Karl Lynch wrote:a nice facial
Bukake-style!

I didnt want to be the one to say it..

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:54 pm

bukake-style

thing is I don't know what that means... but I've probably done it

that's normally what happens anyway...

Certainly sounds sensible to me, Mark. I have no idea why anyone should have preconcieved ideas of what people should and shouldn't do regarding sex. Try it and see if you like it, I say

Optimus Prime Rib · Post by **Optimus Prime Rib** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:04 pm

Karl Lynch wrote:
bukake-style
thing is I don't know what that means...

target practice for the whole party is about as nice as I can put it

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:11 pm

Master_Fwiffo wrote:Apparently, this board does not support the (root) sign.

Yo!

True = ((X^2 == Y) == (Y^0.5 == X))

Yeah, we enlightened types tend to use the RISC FPU Logarithmic approach instead.

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:43 pm

Karl Lynch wrote:
bukake-style
thing is I don't know what that means... but I've probably done it that's normally what happens anyway...

Certainly sounds sensible to me, Mark. I have no idea why anyone should have preconcieved ideas of what people should and shouldn't do regarding sex. Try it and see if you like it, I say

Bukake is having ppl ejaculate over you, generally your face.

Anyhows, pre-conceptions, I expect religon plays a big part in thinking that ppl shouldnt be Homosexual - bad religon!!!

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:39 pm

Bukake is having ppl ejaculate over you, generally your face.

Yep, precisely as I expected...

anyone want to see the T-shirt I bought?

Impactor returns 2.0 · Post by **Impactor returns 2.0** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:43 pm

does it say

'Cum dump' ?

Post by **Denyer** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:09 pm

Optimus Prime Rib wrote:mankind will cease

You think we'll be reproducing via sex?

Karl Lynch wrote:doesn't everybody?

Pretty clear complexion, latterly toughened by electric razors...

Predabot · Post by **Predabot** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:13 pm

....

I can hardly be arsed to take a shower each week..

Pissin' Poonani · Post by **Pissin' Poonani** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:18 pm

Predabot wrote:....

I can hardly be arsed to take a shower each week..

Nice. You must smell like the aftermath of a zombie bukkake fest.

Post by **Kaylee** » Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:25 pm

Denyer wrote:
Karl Lynch wrote:doesn't everybody?
Pretty clear complexion, latterly toughened by electric razors...

I was talking about Mark's 'lubrication'... so either I was misunderstood or you have some interesting grooming techniques

and boo-urns to Predabot. Like that's anything new.

Optimus Prime Rib · Post by **Optimus Prime Rib** » Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:59 am

Impactor returns 2.0 wrote:does it say

'Cum dump' ?

son of a bitch mark! I was taking a nice long drink of my rum and coke and just about drowned when I read that

Post by **Best First** » Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:02 am

Karl Lynch wrote:nothing metrosexual here, babe. It's a word to describe het guys trying to be gay

your prejudice disgusts me...

plus i'm way sexier than you.

Post by **Kaylee** » Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:06 am

does it say

'Cum dump' ?

plus i'm way sexier than you.

So who was the chap I met at Transforce?

:D

Brendocon · Post by **Brendocon** » Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:12 am

Karl Lynch wrote:
plus i'm way sexier than you.
So who was the chap I met at Transforce?

:D

The box over his head is what makes all the pretty women squeal. That and the taser.

TransFans.co.uk

girls are evil!!

Re: girls are evil!!

Re: girls are evil!!